“Many scientific-minded persons have even sacrificed their religious and philosophical leanings for fear of uncontrolled subjectivism. By way of compensation for the loss of a world that pulsed with our blood and breathed with our breath, we have developed an enthusiasm  for facts-mountains of facts  far beyond any single individual’s power to survey. We have the pious hope that this incidental ( or intentional for that matter) accumulation of facts will form a meaningful whole. ”  C.G. Jung-Psychology and the East 

At least one intellectual amongst thousands is prescient and get’s it! Kudos to you C.G.!

And to the readers, don’t get scared by  esoteric Greek terms like Epistemology. I wouldn’t use them, myself, unless they were irreplacable – which is the case here!

Epistemology is officially the “Science of Knowledge” .What it really refers to is how we access Reality i.e. how do we figure out what is really going on!. And mostly we are doing it the wrong way! The social consensus is that the way to do this is to gather as much “data” as possible and then to analyse the data via statistical computation and logical analysis. Wrong! This is a very unreliable approach- advanced by the believers in Empiricism and “evidence-based ” conclusions”-the Materialists!

Ever hear that term “evidence-based” lol? It is thrown at us at every turn of the road of knowledge: “Evidence-based ,evidence-based” as if it were the holy grail of Truth. And not only by the bad guys. The good guys like Pierre Kory and Paul Marik and Peter McCullough and Paul Thomas, all of whom I love and respect ALL use it as if it were part of the Ten Commandments. In this article I am going to turn the entire Epistemological edifice on its head and argue that we are mostly going about this the wrong way and I will try to show you why that is and how we can correct course.

So let me explain to you why this is a faulty protocol and what the options are. Firstly  we have to realize that we are socially conditioned  from the git-go, especially in our educational  institutions  to privilege outward knowledge – also known as “being  objective”. And we are taught to be biased against the subjective. And the “subjective ” is denounced as ” subjective”,  “unreliable” ” “anecdotal” ,”unscientific” and all the other curse words our Empiricist thinkers can come up with!

Philosophically this approach is known as Empiricism or Positivism or Philosophical Materialism and it is probably the greatest impediment to finding Truth in the  modern world. For those of you who are scratching their heads at this point and wondering what I am talking about, let me repeat. Our greatest enemy is NOT subjectivity at this point. Our greatest enemy is objectivity, the outward, the measurable! 

.As we begin to investigate this denunciation of the subjective, we will see that, actually, the subjective is the more reliable. In fact the ultimate knowledge, the essential mystical knowledge- Samadhi, Satori, Nirvana, Fana,  Marifat-whatever tradition you choose to formulate it in-  is subjective. The ultimate Reality is not the “it”(  (third person, object ) but rather the “I”( first person subject.)  Remember the great Vedantic statement.” Tat Tvam Asi” (I am that.) The end-goal of ALL quests for knowledge is the “I” !  The subject reins supreme. Awesome once you get it

Given this realization how do we locate reality with this new understanding ? Here is the hierarchy!

1) Personal experience first!

I am surely going to be accused of heresy here by my scientific colleagues lol. But that’s O.K. with me. I am much more interested in truth then “political correctness” of any kind-whether political, medical or spiritual.

In fact we all know this. Whenever something is told to us, we check back with our personal experience and see if it fits. Often enough, that is all we need to do! We have just been coerced into believing that our experience is unreliable and we should believe the experts! I think the Covid fiasco has led most of us to begin questioning that trope!

So as to bring  all of this back to the ground level, let me give you one concrete  example where both the “good guys” and the “bad guys ” got it wrong- the question of masks! Even the ultimate villain of the Covid debacle-Fauci- flip flopped on this one. Why did they get it so wrong? Because they didn’t have any quality studies that showed positive efficacy for masks. The fact that Orientals have been using that method of protection for decades didn’t matter. The fact that doctors and nurses were pleading for that form of protection(Remember: “PPE. We need PPE!”) in the hospitals and still use masks to protect themselves in various situations didn’t matter! But -no good studies, their ultimate Epistemology , told them they were useless!

So here comes the subjective. That annoying, irritating, contrarian reality of personal experience, to the rescue. I got Covid 5 times during the pandemic! Each time I was NOT wearing a mask! And I never got sick while wearing one. I also remember the famous Harvard professor of Law Alan Dershowitz  showing his more or less airtight mask on Fox News and saying that despite having several risk factors and flying all around the country, he, too never got sick with Covid( He was clearly more disciplined than me about his mask-wearing behaviour lol). For me THAT is a data point-in fact an example of the second level of Epistemology-the Anecdote!

Another example, in a different dimension: the n.d.e.rs ( near-death experiencers)..Once they have seen the other side there is no  longer any doubts. Any of the  “scientific” attempts  to discount their experience through neuroscience, neurotransmitters, E.E.G. results, doppler ultrasounds, cerebral hypoxia, endorphins leave them cold They have experienced Reality! No amount of neuroscience can talk them out of it! No amount of theological postulates can change their beliefs. The Sufis call it Haqq al Yaqin( The Certainty of Truth). Once you have it , you cannot turn back. And “science” as we know it, looks so pitiful from that vantage point!

2) Anecdotes!

Those most maligned of entities in the “scientific ” mind-set.! ” “Oh, that’s only anecdotal” they like to chime. Wrong ,again! Anecdotes are awesome. If we look at our own experience, we use them all the time. A friend says: “I went to the Bahamas for vacation this year .And I loved it”. No more Miami and Cuba this winter. Bahamas it is. Someone says to an eager male “My wife has a friend from work that I think would make a good partner for you”. We’re off and running lol. No obsessional searches on Tourism websites for the best winter getaways. No joining up the latest dating app and scrolling through hundreds of profiles(the scientific comprehensive”(another dirty word in my vocabulary). We’re into it. Let’s go! 

Let me give you a couple of other examples. When the possible link between vaccines and autism came out, I was sceptical at first. I searched through the Pubmed literature and could find nothing compelling. I even, mistakenly, told my sheikh of the time who had asked me the question that I didn’t see anything to worry about. Mistake which I tried to correct several years later. By that time many of his murids had figured it out themselves, so they didn’t need my advice. Then a patient came to see me .She had a husband who was in all likelihood a functional autistic. But her son was a more serious non-verbal screaming, head-banging type and that was the reason she needed therapy.

She told me  the following: ” I knew my son was not well the moment he was born. So it’s not from the vaccines. But I participate in a support group for mothers of autistic children .In that group we are 14 mothers. our of them swear that their babies were completely normal until they had one of the many vaccines on the schedule. They regressed quickly within a few days and have never been the same since !” 4/14! Bazinga! End of story. Over the years despite all the manipulation and pressure and gas-lighting the research has proved this to be true. But they are still trying to hide the reality behind vacuous statements like “Vaccines are Safe and Effective” Liar ,liar, pants on fire lol  Instead the institutions in place are trying to set fire to the practices of the doctors who have discovered the Truth!

So we now have RFK jr.( Secretary of Health) who  has stated that by August, through honest. scientific analysis, he will have the answer?! But we already know! Listen to the mothers, listen to the clinically astute doctors, listen to the aware teachers. Listen to the highly credible Dr. Andrew Wakefield, one of the first to discover the connection. We already know! I get that RFK jr. has to prove it-for political reasons! I get all the forms of objections he is receiving and btw will continue to receive. But we already know! All this “scientific” mental gymnastics is unnecessary! But we are not there yet in our Epistemology!

Another anecdote. The O.J. trial- for those of you who have been around for that long! Seemed quite clear from the beginning. But when I heard the following anecdote it was “Bazinga” again. Or for the science buffs who love Archimedes it was Eureka lol.! When a long-time friend of O.J. heard the news of the murder he exclaimed without a moment’s thought:” He finally did it!”. Case closed, for me anyway. T hen the long, long trial in which the lawyers managed to confuse the jury with more and more “facts” and he was acquitted! What a travesty. What a disillusioning proof against “due process”. Due process is a sham  actually. We can see that with the Trump deportations. We can see that with the poor black and Hispanic people who are defended by public defenders who have neither the time nor often the capacity to do a proper defense. And we can see that with the length of time it took them to catch up with Jeffrey Epstein of more recently with Pudd Diddy!

Third anecdote: When Covid had barely started in the middle of January 2020, Luc Montagnier the Noble-prize winning virologist looked at the gene sequence and said; “no doubt! This has to come from a lab”. That was it! Case Closed . Then the entire French medical establishment attacked him, as they did Didier Raoult ,one of the first successful treaters of Covid. “Oh, he’s old ,demented beyond his prime.” Liar, liar, pants on fire”. At that point the whole world was on fire-thanks to American “gain of function” research that was transferred to China. No, not the Chinese Virus, the American one, Trump. Reproduced in China like everything else-good or bad- that comes from America. A pirated copy of the genetically transformed Corona virus-made in the U.S.A.! No tariffs required lol

As you can see, it’s quite simple actually or as Erving Polster used to say to us in his Gestalt Therapy seminars: “It’s simple ,but it’s not easy”. Right on Erving! When I told my Nobel-track science cousin that for me three credible anecdotes were worth more than 100 double-blind studies, she said she was not shocked .But, I’m sure she was! Denial is one of the most toxic wea[pons in the plots of the villains. And denial is endemic in our so-called democratic society- which is becoming more and more authoritarian. Reality that is also being denied!

3)Reports on the Ground  We will use medical contexts here although it can equally well apply to many other situations- like business and travel and spiritual seeking. So during Covid there were people, admittedly a minority and more likely nurses than doctors, who saw what was going on. These reports “on the ground” have to be from people with good observational skills and a non-ideological mind-set. The “vaccines are safe and effective” people, the “follow the protocol or the algorithm” people, the obedient rule -following people(read doctors lol) will not do! .But if we can find these fore-runners ,we can get valuable information. Unfortunately ,most of the people on the front lines are already “brain-washed” by their education. The “We need large-scale double blind randomized trials confirmed by the Cochrane Data-base ” people are of no use here. By the time they arrive at their conclusions, the crisis is over! And that is exactly what happened and is still happening to some extent with Covid. The others, the clear-minded observers are at risk to lose their jobs and their professions, unfortunately. and that adds in another layer of complexity!

4  ) Using Basic Principles of Science .Like no vaccines during pregnancy-an age-old principle that was completely overthrown during the Covid hysteria.

But let me give you a simpler example of how this works. I was at a Passover seder at my parents house when one of their Christian friends started coughing spasmodically. The conversation went like this

“What’s going on, Henry”

“I have this terrible cough and none of the doctors can figure out what is going on”

“So what did they do about it?’

One of the specialists I went to see had seen an article where this kind of cough could be caused by Hiatus Hernia. And so I was operated on! A four-hour long surgery that took me weeks, if not months, to recuperate from!”

“Did it help?” I ]enquired. “Not at all All it did was give me digestive problems on top of my cough”

” Look Henry, cough is a respiratory symptom. Let me refer you to the Royal Edward Chest Hospital” (too good a service for our medicare system so terminated and merged with another inefficient service at our superhospital since).Subject for another article!

So the next week he went. Was seen quickly, was diagnosed with asthma! Given anti-asthmatic meds and his symptoms were gone! Simple biology. Cough does not come from the gut. It comes from the Respiratory system. Problem solved.

5) Scientific Studies- Last AND least in my Epistemology-despite the social consensus! Why is that? I have written a more elaborate piece on this in my article( on this blog) called “Science, Scientism and Studyism” -the latter being my own term for The Cult of Studies lol Here is a brief resumé of the problems with studies!

Now “the good guys” -RFKjr,  Paul Marik , Peter McCullough would like us to believe that the only problem with scientific studies is corruption of one form or another-whether it be financial or academic ambition or political bias. But I beg to differ! So let us go through the different problems and pitfalls  in “the scientific” approach.

1. The initial intellectual bias of the authors. When I was asked to teach a course at McGill in research in psychiatry I found an article by a brilliant researcher who showed that in the previous ten years none of the most read papers came to a conclusion opposite to what one would have expected knowing their track record in academia! ( unfortunately I have not been able to relocate this article but for the curious you are welcome to research it and get back to me .It was probably published in the late 70’s or early 80’s as I taught this course in the mid-80’s. So this problem has been going on for a long time! And there are no signs of improvement. In fact, it seems that scientific fraud has been increasing rather than decreasing!

2) The hidden and less hidden financial and academic motivations of the companies, institutions and universities financing this research. (Btw this is what most of “the good guys” are focused on. Not realizing that there are deeper ,more intrinsic problems in the scientific model) Everyone knows how hard it is to get financing for studies about non-patentable, natural remedies. But come out with a new class of pharmaceuticals(Try GLP1 agents for example lol) and the money is flowing feely.

3)The constant bugaboos of Statistical Analysis-selection bias and confounding variables- errors you will find in even the most sophisticated of studies published in the most prestigious of peer-reviewed studies. One of the best examples of this is the waves of propaganda against benzodiazepines. In most of the studies the benzo group is already more at risk than the comparator .This is very important clinically  as the alternative (often SSRIs) have considerably more troubling side effects. Yet they are still “the gold standard” in treating anxiety.

4) The law of Diminishing returns in data collection. Just as The New Age thinkers would remind us; “More is not better” Despite what the statisticians tell us! The prestigious medical journal Lancet had to retract a hydroxychloroquine study when it became evident that the data was not only faulty. It was fraudulent. But when the editors saw the huge numbers of cases reported ,they became as excited as an adolescent boy seeing big breasts for the first time! How could they resist lol?!

5) Sophisticated randomized, double-blind studies are VERY expensive. We can only study in that matter a very small selection of decisions that medical doctors face in their practices on a daily basis. It is NOT a reliable source of information for most of our practice.

6 )The studies are statistical. But medical practice is individual-case by case. If a medication is 60% effective, like many of our antidepressants, how do I know whether my patient will be in the 60% or the 40%. And how do I even know how well she or he corresponds to the treatment group in the studies which may have excluded all kinds of comorbidities that my own patient has?!

We could easily go on and on. But let me summarize by saying that we need to seriously challenge the Cult of Science. It has brought us some benefit but also MUCH harm.( If you need proof, think of all the deaths being caused by missiles and explosives and drones -all developed by science! Also almost every single carcinogen in the Environment-from glyphosate, to pesticides to radio-frequency waves  and other EMFs as well as formaldehyde and other chemicals in our construction materials was  all developed by science! So be sceptical. Don’t join the Cult! Think it through .Develop your inner vision, your Ear of Truth and your heartfelt intuitions and see where that leads you  I am available if you need further guidance. Salaams, Sufi Ibrahim

Important Addendum: I realized after completing the first draft of this article that I had forgotten a very important source of Knowledge- Trusted Sources! That is largely because I was focused on medicine and science. After the Covid debacle, there were very few sources I could consider reliable .Even the most prestigious scientific journals like Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine were playing games with the data. Let alone the so-called authorities like Fauci and the heads of CDC and FDA. Nothing reliable there!

However, in the domain of spirituality, we cannot ignore the real sources. We cannot rely only on ourselves. When I confronted one of the major players at the annual FLCCC (now IMA) conference with his lack of spiritual content, he gingerly  took out a small cross from beneath his undershirt and said: “I have a personal relationship with Jesus” .” That’s not enough, Chris” I said .We need a teacher, an intermediary. I forgot toi mention that even Jesus needed someone to initiate him-John the Baptist in his case! .Our Prophet Mohammed saws was invariably accompanied by the angel Gabriel on his journey. And Moses had his brother Aaron. So bottom line, despite the modernist agenda of individualism, we can’t do it on our own- not in this domain for sure!

That doesn’t mean we can always trust the Sources either. The books of Moses were only written down several hundred years after the revelation, the Christian texts that we have are written in Greek-not the language of Jesus. And even in Islam with the most reliable and authentic of the books ,the Quran, the scholars and the translators play around with its meaning in a way that is distorting and misleading.

Our spiritual teachers that we love and trust are themselves fallible as well. On my own path, my first Sufi Muslim teacher turned out to be breaking many rules of Shariah with the female murids. My second teacher Bawa Muhyideen was so transcendent in his state that his worldly advice, especially about marriage, was mostly wrong.S heikh Nazim ,who is probably the person I learnt most from in this life and carried the most palpable form of Love I have ever seen, was notoriously bad in his medical advice lol. And my last teacher ,who was obviously in a very high spiritual rank, was unable to break out of his ethnic background to be able to advise  people from other backgrounds on their path.

So even there, with some of the most spiritually advanced beings on the planet, we need to exercise our judgment and discernment if we are to avoid painful consequences. May Allah guide us and protect us! Salaams, Sufi Ibrahim