Fascinating Womanhood by Helen Andelin-The Antidote to “Toxic Feminism”

“Fascinating Womanhood” by Helen Andelin:

The Antidote to “Toxic Feminism”

In the 1980’s, I would go to Peckham, London every year during Ramadan to be with my Sufi Sheikh -Sheikh Nazim Naqshbandi. One of the things he would do later in the day was to go touring around London to rest from his grueling schedule. I accompanied him on several occasions on his “rounding” trips and I noticed something peculiar during those times. Generally Sheikh Nazim was a good-mannered, jovial person. Everyone loved him for his good character and good humour. But I noticed that there were two things that would get him upset. Let’s remember that these were the days before the internet so London was plastered with billboards of all types. Two of those types would bother him. So what were they? Billboards praising Communism and billboards praising Feminism.

It must be remembered that this was the sheikh’s first incursions into the Western world. Previously his life had been confined to Turkish Cyprus, Turkey, Damascus and regular visits to the holy sites of Mecca and Madina-that is until the Wahhabbi Saudis blocked him lol(or he blocked himself-not sure which lol).But this was his first real contact with the West.

Now there was something very special about Sheikh Nazim’s relationship with the West. Unlike almost every other Eastern spiritual teacher I have met, he seemed to immediately understand what was going on- better than most Western people in fact! He appreciated Western peoples’ open-mindedness, their capacity to invent new technologies and their desire to do things well. And occasionally he would joke about it saying if we had left technology to the Easterners we never would have had cars or airplanes.

He also understood racism and nationalism and would bring up hadith like “Love of the homeland is from Faith” And the Quranic ayats about Allah having created tribes and nations to indicate that it was all fine. Except he had none of the liberal delusions about us all being the same. He could address the strengths and weaknesses of all peoples without disparaging any of them. ”Germans they are walking like this” he would say in his inimical TurkEnglish. And he would imitate a militaristic walk. ”But the English ones, they are lazy ones” and he would imitate their slow walking into the zawiya-as if they were resisting all the way. He would even take to task his own people saying: “Turks, they are foolish ones, like sheep. But they are very strong militarily. And he would bring up the fact, hitherto unknown to me, that during the Korean War the first ones to break the Northern Korean lines were the Turks. No wonder they ruled the Islamic world during the Ottoman Empire for 500 years! Everyone seemed to take his comments in stride as they were all said in good humour. But there was an important point being made at the same time! We are all different-different strengths and different weaknesses. So stop trying to homogenize humanity, O liberals. Just as individuals are different so are nations. Woke liberals, get used to it lol.

So with such loving acceptance of differences, why was he upset with Communism and Feminism. Over the years I have come to see the wisdom and depth of his vision. Now, remember, I was coming still at that time from a liberal, left-wing perspective. I had left Marxism 10 years earlier but I was still sympathetic to left-wing causes . And as to feminism, I was still generally sympathetic. Now most people at this point, have long since rejected Marxism. Even Jean-Paul Sartre although it took him a long time lol! The cost of being an intellectual! .After the tyrannical excesses of Stalin, Mao Tse Tung’s Great Leap Forward and  the Cultural Revolution that together probably caused over 40 million deaths! After Pol Pot in Cambodia and Kim Il Sung in North Korea not too many people give Classical Marxism any credibility nowadays. And they shouldn’t !

However Feminism still rides high in public opinion. Even the Eastern cultures are adapting it’s principles more and more-leading to the inevitable increase in family tensions, divorce rates and illicit sexual behaviour. But it has penetrated deeply into people’s unconscious-so much so that even our Western Islamic scholars(I will not name them here but you know who they are. Think of any of the high-profile scholars of Islam in the West!)) are unwilling to challenge them. When I told one of my American Sufi teachers that all his Western female disciples were still deeply feminist, he dismissed the idea completely .  He may, at this point, be reconsidering as they are the very group who brought his reputation into disrepute with a scandalous story of child abuse in his Community school. Ignoring reality is never a good option-even for Sufis!

This article is one of the most sensitive and personal and controversial I have written. And admittedly I approach it with a certain trepidation. I know that people have very strong feelings about this subject. But it’s content needs to be heard. Just like the vaccine mandates across the world( I am not talking about Covid vaccines but the child mandates required to go to school in California for example) are destroying a generation and possibly two of children, Feminism is the corresponding toxin that is destroying generations of Couples and families and the plague is by no means over.

Experts like John Gottman (“The Seven Keys to Successful Marriage”) are now finding that if we follow married couples in the U.S. for fourty years, the divorce rate is somewhere between 60-70 %.And that is for married couple?! Imagine the others. The” experts” in the field like Gottman and Terrence Real both of whom I respect -in Gottman’s case for his assiduous research and as to Terry Real for his obvious clinical acumen-don’t get it! They, too, have drunk the Koolaid of Feminist ideology. Both believe largely that the problem is individual and Tewrry Real(what a name for the irrealitry of his sociological position lol) believes the problem is “toxic masculinity”. Really?! In what world is he living in?! Toxic masculinity has been denounced for more than fifty years at least We hear terms every day like”male chauvists”,”macho” ,”misogynist”, “patriarchical” etc.,etc. Not that there aren’t toxic and sicko, paranoid males out there. But I would contend that in the grand scheme of things “Toxic Feminism ‘ is a much more corrosive force in the word than ”Toxic Masculinity”!

As I hinted at earlier in this essay, this is a very personal issue for me. Both my family of origin ( domineering mother and weak father) and my current family of an ex-wife and three daughters have been negatively affected by this toxic feminism. I cannot here go into all the details as too many people still alive would probably be offended, but let me say in all humility that since becoming Muslim in 1978,I have had four marriages including a 24 year-long marriage to the mother of my three children. And I am convinced that Feminism was a determinant factor in the ultimate termination of each of these relationships! Don’t get me wrong here lol. I am not claiming to be a perfect character or an easy one. I do get upset from time to time especially when I feel I am being unfairly challenged. But I have never hit or threatened to hit any of my marital partners. I have always assumed my responsibilities and done my best to take care of the people around me-something I still do every day. So there was no reason for these marriages to “fail”.

But I am a man lol. And I have a strong sense of mission. Unlike the Red/Green limerick: ”I’m a man, but I can change if I have to I guess’ lol You can hear the intonations of Feminism in that very limerick. The man has to change. Not the woman, right? She is “full of sugar and spice and everything nice” . Isn’t that what the poem says?

Well, I am a man and there are things I can change but one of them is not my sense of mission. And as Helen Andelin will tell us shortly, it is the job of the woman to support the man’s mission!

More than supporting her own ambition (a basic teaching of Feminism)and the ego-centric desires of the children she needs to support his mission and thereby his leadership. Anything else will lead to disharmony and conflict and misery all around-both for the man and the woman and the children. And that is precisely what we see all around us! So now let us explore the remedy-the work of Helen Andelin!

Firstly, who is Helen Andelin. Most of us including the well-read amongst us have never heard of her! Not surprising since the Feminists “love to hate her” lol and they have the same control over the main stream media that Fauci had over the vaccine question lol!

Helen Andelin ( May 22,1920-June 7 2009)was the founder of the “Fascinating Womanhood” movement and taught marriage classes in the early 1960’s.She was born into a Latter-day Saint Mormon family in Arizona. and received a Bachelor’s degree from Brigham Young University-he (B.Y.) is the successor of Joseph Smith) in Home Economics! How quaint. Muslim readers should note that the Mormons are considered non-Trinitarian Christians in that they believe that God, Jesus and the Holy Ghost are separate personalities. That brings them closer to Islam in their theology.

Now, on a personal note, I have met numerous Mormons proselytizing in my childhood neigbourhood and have followed others like Mitt Romney and Orrin Hatch over the years in American Politics. My personal take is that they are very upright moral people(I can never stop being grateful to Rep.Hatch saying to Congress: ”You will never take away my vitamins and supplements” when the U.S. Congress was being lobbied by the Pharma companies to regulate natural products and thus put many of these companies out of business! Thank you Orin wherever you may be lol).

On the other hand, these same Mormons always appeared to me as overly strict and moralistic-as some “good people” tend to be. So I am wary for sure. As to how this may apply to the current discussion, I don’t think anyone -man or woman- can quite meet the standards of behaviour that Helen is advocating in her writing. That being said, I think the general thrust of the argument is correct and with some adaptive manoeuvres to prevent becoming too ideological, I think her ideas represent a potent instrument in cleansing contemporary relationship of “Toxic Feminism” something that even the conservatives and right-wing Christians AND Muslims have not been able to formulate so far.

So without further ado lol. let us present the ideas of Helen Andelin directed at women wanting to improve their relationships. Next to each of these ideas I will present the current Feminist positions that make these ideas-as practical and true as they may be-seem counter-intuitive!

A-The Two Ideal Female Types. Hele4n begins by defining two ideal types of womenthe Angelic and the Human. The Angelic woman understands men, has deep inner peace ,has a worthy character and is a “Domestic Goddess” (a bit of a hyperbole but let’s say she really enjoys her vocation as  a home-maker).

The Feminists are already up in arms lol ”Why can’t she have a career? Why does she have to understand men? Don’t they also have to understand women” We will try to answer these objections as best we can. I don’t believe Helen was against womens’  careers- she just wanted them to prioritize their family life .When the research  psychologists study happiness and success, they find that women prioritize their relationships and men prioritize their work! Vive la difference. Genetics is still a powerful force indeed.After all it represents God’s will!

The second type of ideal woman is of Human nature. She is ultimately feminine, charms, fascinates and amuses. She arouses a desire in the male to protect and shelter. She has a childlike-ness about her.

Feminist response: Why do women have to be charming to get what they want?! Why can’t they be strong and self-sufficient? Why should they be childlike? Isn’t it better to be an adult? The answer to all that is that by women trying to be more and more like men, they alienate the latter and turn them off. That creates more and more friction and ultimately relationship failure!

To illustrate her points, Helen uses the novel “David Copperfield” and talks about the latter’s two partners-Agnes who represents the angelic type and Dora the human type Here is what he says:

“The feeling David had for Agnes was one near worship(haven’t seen much of that nowadays lol).She had a sacred influence on him. She brought him peace and happiness and without her he seemed to “go wild and get into difficulty. Thinking about her ‘soothed him imto tears’. He felt like she was a part of him-as one of the elements of my natural home” The feeling he had for Dora was different. She fascinated him and amused him’ She was more than human to me. She was a fairy and a sylph…All of her delicate and bright mannerisms aroused his irresistible longing to shelter and protect her. The kind of love David felt for Dora was forceful,consuming and intense. He felt like “biting the key of his carpet bag”( we would probably say biting our lips from disbelief!).He was in “fairyland.He cwas a captive and a slave.”

This type of love was not complete however. While married to Agnes (after Dora died-this is England not Saudi Arabia lol) he experienced peace and happiness and he loved her dearly, but he still had tender recollections of Dora which sent stirring feelings through his heart.

Now this may all sound whimsical and phantasmagoric but it is not that distant from our own experience- if we look closely. In Islamic history, as we study carefully the life of our Prophet saws, we will see the two types in Khadija r.a. the first wife of the Prophet a.s was like  Agnes, the angelic type and Ayesha r.a.was the Dora type

Prophet Muhammad (saw) remembered  his beloved wife Khadijah (ra) fondly  as “she believed in me when all others disbelieved; she held me truthful when others called me a liar; she sheltered me when others abandoned me; she comforted me when others shunned me; and Allah (SWT) granted me children by her while …  Prophet Muhammad once said that the four greatest women of mankind were: Khadija bint Khuwaylid (his first wife), Fatima bint Muhammad (his youngest daughter,) Mary bint Imran (the Virgin Mary) and Asiya bint Muzahim (the wife of Pharaoh.)

So she was the Celestial wife. As to Ayesha r.a. she was young and charming and childlike. They raced with each other and played with each other and enjoyed each other’s company. She was the Prophet’s favourite wife after Khadija died. And it remained so til the end of his life.

Now for each of us, we can think back to our own relationships and find instances of these kind of feelings. Unfortunately, in the modern world, they usually do not last very long. The received wisdom” in the world of psychology is that the honeymoon feeling is over by three-six months. Often shorter than that! But perhaps it doesn’t have to be so. So let us continue with the ideas of Helen Andelin

B-Accept the Man at Face Value:

And what does that mean? Helen explains: ”It means that we recognize him as a human being who, like ourselves and all  other humans, is part virtue and part fault. It is a very honest approach. We realize that the faults are there, but we are not concerned about them. for we accept the total man. If he wants to change on his own, that is his business. We are satisfied with him as he is.

N.B. We are NOT talking about abuse here! Neither physical nor emotional abuse. Neither Ms. Andelin nor the author here can accept that .I will mention a little later Helen’s ’approach to that problem.

She goes on to mention how and what women try to change in their partners.

a-Personal Habits: poor eating habits, poor table manners, neglect of appearance, poor grammar, bad temper, depressed mood, careless driving, being untidy (leaving things lying around the house). etc.etc.

On this note, I remember a female client complaining about her partners leaving his dirty socks lying around. When I questioned her further, I found out that at the same time, he had spent 35 hours building a deck outside this house. When I questioned wasn’t it worth it to her to spend a few moments picking up some dirty clothes for the services she was receiving, she responded that it was not a matter of time, but a matter of principle! Not the first person I have met who made themselves miserable through questions of principle l,ol!

b- How he spends His time: Complaining that he spends too much time with the boys, watching sporting events (I’m with you on that one ladies lol) or simply napping on the couch.

c-Duties: neglect of home repairs, yard work, painting, taking out the garbage(that’s a popular one lol)

d-Social Behaviour-talks too much, brags too much, talks too little (guess you can’t win!), says the wrong things. doesn’t treat people properly (I personally witnessed a seventy-year old couple in a restaurant where the wife was chewing out her husband for not being nice enough to the waitress.I wonder how long that had been going on for?!)

e-Dreams and desires: Husbands don’t have enough ambition, shift their goals too often, have too wild dreams (seen lots of that lol)

f-Manly Accomplishments: want the husband to be more successful, to make more money, to be more decisive.

f-Money: Manages money poorly, spends too much-especially without consulting, or are too stingy-can’t win, again, eh?

g-Neglect of Children: doesn’t take enough responsibility with respect to the children.

h- not religious enough. Doesn’t pray regularly, doesn’t go to Church

 

Then Helen goes on to say why the women should not complain

  • It causes marriage problems
  • It destroys love
  • it doesn’t work
  • It causes the man to become resentful

Instead she recommends the following:

  • Get rid of your self-righteous attitude ( the worst cases of this I have seen in women who have alcoholic husbands .It is then always the husband who is wrong! And the woman can be addicted to being right! Oddly enough when the husband cures his addiction (and yes, the gender roles can be reversed here!) the relationship often disintegrates. Intriguing?!)
  • Look to his better side!
  • Do not compare him to other men (for reasons that will soon be explained-male pride!)
  • Express your acceptance

The Feminist reply: How can I accept the unacceptable? Why should I keep quiet? Should I let him walk all over me and still keep silent?” The answer: “Only if you want to maintain a harmonious marriage .If you want to keep quarreling, that’s fine. You will certainly be consistent with social norms lol

 

C-Express Admiration ( The feminists are already saying: “Now you are going too far. Why should I do that?! Am I not as good as him?!The answer to that question is: ‘it will improve and save your marriage’! A word of wisdom from Helen on gender differences here; ”The center of woman’s happiness in marriage is to be loved by her mate-but the center of man’s is to be admired” Beautiful insight! Yes, we are different. Vive la différence!

She goes on to explain that deep in the heart of every man he longs for admiration-of his abilities, his ideas and his dreams.

: his physical strength

: his manly courage

: his sense of duty and honour

: his leadership ability

: his sexual skills;

:his determination and power;

:his devotion to a cause;

:his intellectual capacities;

:his achievement or success;

:his judgment and discernment:

:his noble ideals and aspirations

Of course no man will have all of these, so women need to know what their priorities are in selecting a mate .Once selected, however, they need to affirm him rather than constantly challenge him as contemporary females are wont to do.

I can hear the Feminist chatter already lol.” Are you kidding me. Do you want me to be a lapdog , a brown-noser, a wimp?”  Only if you want to be happy in your relationship. If you instead choose to prove that you are his equal and constantly confronting him with his limitations, you are sure to fail! One of the factors that is sure to lead to failure comes from envy. Freud called it “penis envy” but it is far more than that. It is envy for the male position as opposed to the female one. The roles  are complementary, of course, but if the female challenges for the leadership which is not the “firah”( the natural way),the result is going to be misery-without a doubt!

A spiritual anecdote here. In 1975 I attended my first spiritual event -an EST seminar in a hotel room in San Francisco. In front of an audience of 25 people the” trainer” ( that’s what they called the teacher at the time) looked directly at the audience and said the following. I will never forget it as the phrase resonated throughout my spiritul journey!  “You say that what you want is to be happy, but if you look carefully at your thoughts and behaviour, you will see that what you really want is to be right”. Deep! Ajib! True!

 

D-Male Pride:

Quoting Helen Andelin again “he is proud of his manly qualities…he likes to show them off, to call your attention to them in both conversation and actions.

But it is here that man is most vulnerable, for his pride is extremely sensitive. He cannot bear to have his masculinity belittled, ridiculed or treated with indifference.

When a man is belittled frequently he tends to build a tight wall of reserve around himself-an impenetrable barrier against those who have offended him” i.e .he closes down and becomes non-communicative. John Gottman calls this “stonewalling” It is one of the four horseman of the apocalypse of the marriage.

Feminist response: Who does he think he is?! Does he think the whole world revolves around him?! And the answer: ”In the family ,he is central. He has been given authority by his Creator. As it says in the Quran: 4:34 (Yusuf  Ali tr.): “Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband’s) absence what Allah would have them guard.”

And Quran 2:228

“And women shall have rights similar to the rights against them, according to what is equitable; but men have a degree (of advantage) over them. And Allah is Exalted in Power and Wise”

Interestingly enough you can see that Feminism has penetrated even into even the translations of the Quran by pious Muslims! How so? Well, the word that is translated as rights is . معرف which means benefits not rights( Ah the twists of modernism!That is a significant change of meanings-from rights to benefits!) and the word in Arabic درجت which refers not to a degree of advantage(Yusuf Ali translation) but rather to a rank. ( another significant change of meaning).So in brief, at least for those who believe in the Holy Books, man has a rank above women i.e. he has the authority in the family as a God-given right.

That by no means suggests that he is free to be abusive or demeaning! He has to responsibly and compassionately exercise his leadership. As they say in American politics: ” The buck stops here!”

 

E- Sympathetic Understanding

 

H.A. “The majority of men, when they come of age and marry, take on an enormous burden, which they may not lay down with any conscience this side of the grave. They put aside, in the name of love, most of their vaunted freedom and contract to take upon their shoulders full social and economic responsibility for their wives and children”

“But few women know how to give true sympathy. It isn’t that they don’t try but that they don’t know how(especially nowadays!).He comes to have his soul restored, his self-esteem re- established and his self-doubt removed” And ,in fact how can the wife show sympathy and understanding if she is competing with him?!

 

F-Man’s Role: Guide, Protector and Provider

We have referred to this important function in our Quranic references. Again this underlines the leadership role of men in families.

H.A. ”We have often heard the statement ‘marriage is a partnership’ But what kind of partnership? It is not an equal partnership(as democratic ’modernist’ thinking would like us to believe!) “for man’s role is to be guide, protector, and provider ,whereas woman’s is loving wife, mother and homemaker.

This is one of the key issues in the entire discussion! We have two options-the ideological, egalitarian option which btw is failing miserably something we can see all around us or the “fitrah” option. ”Fitrah” refers to the underlying nature of things-as God designed it- as opposed to man’s idea which he, in his infinite hubris, thinks is better than God’s idea. Religious positions aside, if we adopt the true “scientific” position- of observation, hypothesis and conclusions we have 200 years, at least, of experimentation to tell us that man’s ideas have failed! How much more evidence do we need?!

 

G-Make Him Number 1

A heinous idea to the Feminists! “Why shouldn’t the woman be number one?” they would argue. My answer is; ”Because that’s not the way God set it up. Sorry ladies! It is not what you want, but you don’t get to decide.”As say the Americans in business-”That’s not your pay level” lol Or to refer back to the EST seminars, they compared these realities to the laws of gravity! “You don’t get to decide whether the ball falls to the ground when you let it go.The laws of nature are what they are. Outside of your control!” “

So he is number one-even before children (yes, a common option amongst women and part of their genetic programming) before homemaking (yes, housekeeping is important but heart-keeping is more so. I have heard this one from many of my patients-that their mother was more concerned with the state of the house then the state of their hearts); money and security(many women oppose their husbands business initiatives and personal projects-even spiritual ones-on the argument that it would threaten their economic security).

I, personally, suffered from this as my Mom vetoed my father’s desire to open his own technology repair business, which he loved doing and brow-beat him into staying at a job in a factory that he hated-all for fear for our financial well-being.

Another wrong priority-her parents. Gottman makes it clear in his chapter on in-laws that both partners need to prioritize their current families. However, I have seen this particularly amongst Muslims who use religious phrases like “bir walidayn” (filial piety) to deprive their current partners of their rights. I have several clinical vignettes about this but will leave them for a later time as this article has already gone beyond the intended length.

Careers: This is a “biggie” for feminists. “Why shouldn’t we have a right to careers just like men?” they will assert .The answer to this can be quite complicated but essentially it comes down to biology or should I say neuroscience” as this is a modern catch-phrase. The psychology researchers find, for example, when women come to evaluate the success of their lives, they look to their relationships whereas men turn to their professional success. This is changing somewhat as men become more feminized and less aware of their masculine nature! But the basic premise remains true. This is the way we are hard-wired!

 

H- The Domestic Goddess

The domestic Goddess is a woman who really enjoys being a housemaker. She is proud of her house, proud of her children and yes, horror of horrors to Feminists, proud of her husband! She puts a “light warmth and spirit into the home”, and sees homemaking as a celestial activity-attempting to generate an earthly form of the garden (as fragile as that may be in this life of suffering).She does not fall for the argument that her duties are drudgery and monotonous- as contemporary social conditioning would have her believe!. A brief aside here. As these career women, often totally stressed out, go running to mindfulness workshops to unstress. What could possibly be more boring than sitting on your tush for hours on end?! Lol. Cooking and cleaning are in comparison a veritable delight-especially if you see it as an act of worship and service. The Hindus rightfully consider that “karma yoga’. But these same New-Age women who take a delight in washing dishes at the Ashram find it beneath their dignity to wash dishes for their family?!

 

I-Femininity-The The gentle, tender quality

Obvious, no? H.A. “No heavy, physical work, no slapping men on the back, no whistling loudly, no drinking by throwing your head back, no walking heavily, no looking fierce or hard, no speaking harshly(swearing),no tailored clothes(the male suits of Feminists )” these are some of Helen’s suggestion!

“Femininity is acquired by accentuating the differences between yourself and men, not the similarities. You apply this principle in your appearance, your manner, your actions and even your attitude. The more different you appear than men the more feminine you become.”

“What is feminine manner? It is the motions of a woman’s body, the way she uses her hands, her walk and her talk, the sound of her voice, her facial expressions and her laugh” And all this without excessive affectation or seductiveness I would add.

 

 

J- Feminine Dependency

Whoa! Now we are hitting a core sensitivity nerve amongst the Feminists! “What?! Why should I depend on a man? What if he leaves me in the lurch? What will I do then?!  I don’t trust men enough to rely on them. I want to be “autonomous”(the core tenet of Feminism).”

There are many answers to this position. Let’s first listen to Helen:” The role of man …is to lead, protect, and provide for women. Her need for his manly care is called “feminine dependency”. Rob him of this sensation of superior strength and ability and you rob him of his manliness. You must dispense with any air of masculine strength and ability, of competence  and fearlessnes and acquire an air of feminine dependency upon man to take care of you.The air of being able to “kill your own snakes” is just what destroys the charm of so many women(Think Hilary Clinton lol)

And in any case, have women become more secure with this autonomy?! They put their relationships in jeopardy, they are still subject to the vagaries of the job market, their husbands have become reliant on their income which just puts them under more pressure and their health is never certain especially with the double role of worker and housewife. Ultimately despite what the psychologists teach us lol, we cannot rely on ourselves-whether man or woman.The only entity we can rely on is God-(tawakuul’ it is called in Islam)but  it  takes a lot of work to develop that spiritual virtue.!

 

 

K- Childlikeness

Another one that upsets the Feminist clan! “Why should we be like children?! Can’t we be adult, mature a d responsible/!” they will say

Let’s see what Helen has to say on this one:  ”Childlikeness is one of the most charming qualities in the entire philosophy of Fascinating Womanhood. Dora (one of her female role mode4ls) was ‘captivating, girlish and bright-eyed. Amelia (from Vanity Fair)had the tender emotions of a little child, for her eyes would fill up with tears. Déruchette ( Victor Hugo) had the giddiness, vivacity and teasing playfulness of a little girl”

Are you getting the picture by now ?!  If not, think of the opposites-Hilary Clinton(mentioned above), Angela Merkel, Margaret Thatcher., Indira Ghandhi. These are all women who, for better or for worse, identified with the masculine gender in order to fulfill their leadership roles.They are not good models for women.

And in case people are thinking that Helen is condoning abuse by encouraging dependency and child-likeness. here are a couple of other quotes: ” Must you accept a man at face value when he mistreats you and just overlook it? I am referring to times when he may be thoughtless, unfair ,impose on you, neglect you too fasr ,or is extremely harsh or critical. Man is entitled to many freedoms but he does not have the right to mistreat you…In fact it is difficult for a man to feel romantic towards a woman he can mistreat! It is likewise difficult for her to feel romantic towards the man who mistreats her”! ”When men’s mistreatments  are severe, childlike behaviour is not the answer. The entire philosophy of Fascinating Womanhood must be applied to melt a normally tender heart.There is no excuse for brutish behaviour in men(i.e. if they refuse to change, get rid of them!) In the Islamic tradition, this is confirmed by several hadith of the Prophet saws like this one “Abu Huraira reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The most complete of believers in faith are those with the best character, and the best of you are the best in behavior to their women.”

 

Conclusion: People who know my thinking are aware that I do not like ideologies! So I am not trying to start another ‘ism’-by going from Feminism to “Femininity-ism” lol I am not suggesting that we should consider Helen’s writings here as cathecism. I am however suggesting that she is indicating a radical shift in attitude(yes, a 180 degree shift) from asserting one’s rights to asserting God’s rights-i.e. playing our different gender roles as they are designed to be by our Creator- as opposed to how our minds would like them to be. That could be a solution in many other areas of life as well!

There is much more in Ms. Andelin’s book for those who seek to research the subject further. In Helen Andelin’s writings we have a recipe for success! It flies in the face of a large-scale consensus around feminist ideals and targeting of the evil patriarchy (which is God’s way btw0.Some will find it over-simplistic and unrealistic. Others will find it outrageous and extremist-pandering to the enemy if you wish. Although I too believe that it can be too idealistic as a format and does need to be adapted to specific circumstances-financial and characterological-, it must be said that is largely consistent with traditional values throughout history and with the vast majority of the scriptural texts-at least in the Western religious traditions.

Personally I believe there is a strong core of Truth in these ideas. And it gave me hope that mutually satisfying couple relationships are, in fact, possible-something I had begun to doubt after looking at the relationships in my own life and those around me. I would counsel you,if you are at all open-minded, to have a look and see if there is not something here that you could apply in your own life. It could be a game-changer! Salaams, Sufi Ibrahim

 

Addendum: Instructions for men

One of the possible criticisms of Helen Andelin’s work was that she only addressed proper behaviour for women. Interestingly, I don’t see that criticism coming from the Feminist reviews opposing her work! Another proof of the Narcissism of Feminists lol. Only their gender counts!

But from my point of view, that aspect is necessary as well-if only to create balance and complementarity. Take note that men are simpler creatures, so the instructions do not need to be so elaborate lol So here are my complementary recommendations for men :

1-Assume your leadership role with vigour and firmness -but not with aggression and stubbornness

2_ Be generous and gentle and kind

3_ Work strenuously on yourself-what we Sufis call “jihad-a nafs:-the struggle with the ego(see my Youtube videos on the “klesas” for instruction on this subject)

4_ Be aware of the gender differences (no, we are not the same!) and adapt and adjust accordingly

“And he just said-Good Luck” lol (Bob Dylan)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Another Middle East Statement-Political This Time!

The majority of Arabs don’t want Hamas leading them!;the majority of Lebanese don’t want Hizbollah and the majority of Persians don’t want the Ayotollahs. Given those demographic parameters, the most intelligent American policy would be to support the people against their self-destructive, oppressive leadership. Bur America, to be effective, would have to do that in an overt way-openly and transparently. The Covert CIA type intervention only leads to more mistrust and conspiracy theories. And I don’t know if the American polity is up to the level of sincerity and integrity that kind of intervention would involve.PS If you need more details then you can engage in a discussion about the mechanics  that kind of  operation would involve!

PS Ironically,the precedent for this would be the way the French ,regardless of their motivation,helped the Americans win their war of Independence. Time for payback lol?

Middle East Oct.2023

Middle East Statement

This should hopefully be the last of three statements on the Middle East (the others are on the Sufi Ibrahim Kreps Youtube channel) and the most concrete one. I would advise people against taking sides in this conflict! There is more than enough blame to go around-including the faults of America, of the U.N., of England and Turkey historically -let alone what the two parties involved have been up to!

Taking a strong position on one side or the other thus becomes a manifestation of ignorance! Now I understand that Muslims feel the need to be loyal to the Palestinians. And loyalty IS an Islamic virtue. But the true loyalty is to the Truth not to the tribe!

Feeling the pain is one thing. It is human. But assigning blame and acting from that analysis requires wisdom and discernment and unfortunately that is in short supply nowadays.

Salaams, Sufi Ibrahim

Another Socially-Conditioned Myth.

There are so many of them, it is frightening and dangerous to behold! The socially-conditioned myths like: “You can’t love anyone else if you don’t love yourself” Ever heard that one lol? It’s totally false.

Just came across a new one.” You never know what is going on in a relationship behind closed doors” .Again totally false! It is screaming out at you from every corner. The behaviour in public,, the body language, the attitude of the people involved towards each other, the rumours, their past history-personally and as a couple. It is all there.! “Hiding in plain site” as say the American journalists lol

It is true that we don’t know the details, the specific words said to each other. But the big picture-which is what is important after all?!?! C’mon.

Now how or whether  to intervene? That is another matter! Requires wisdom and discernment and sometimes simple acceptance when there is nothing to be done. But the reality of it is hidden only to the most obtuse of observers. God help us!

Science, Scientism and Study-ism

Science, “Scientism” and “Study-ism”

Ideology and why “Our side” got it wrong on masks!

 

“Many scientific-minded persons have even sacrificed their religious and philosophical leanings for fear of uncontrolled subjectivism. By way of compensation for the loss of a world that pulsed with our blood and breathed with our breath, we have developed an enthusiasm for facts-mountains of facts far beyond any single individual’s (or group for that matter lol) power to survey. We have the pious hope that this incidental accumulation of facts will form a meaningful whole C.G. Jung

What a prescient and eloquent statement! Clearly modern scientists have a lot to learn from some of their intellectual predecessors. Not to mention Herr Sigmund who told them, even before Jung, that man was not essentially a rational being and never would be so. Any surprise there?!

But the scientists push blindly on-as if more data, more statistical analysis, more Cochrane database studies will eventually lead them to the truth. This article is about why that will never happen! Amongst other reasons, there is “The Law of Diminishing Returns” in data just as there is in economic investment. At some point, an excess of data leads to confusion rather than clarity! Ever noticed?!

I am reminded of a clinical case in which a young man was obsessed with where in Montreal he was going to live. He began studying the demographics of each neighbourhood in the Municipal library (this was before Google!) He visited each area and talked to the people. His investigation went on and on. In the end he was totally paralyzed and just decided to stay put. Probably the best decision anyways.

Another example. Imagine yourself trying to figure out where to go on vacation. Most people rely on a friend’s suggestion or their travel agent or an ad on T.V.  Imagine if everyone, before going on vacation, decided to do data analysis on each site that was possible-and there are many of them! They would end up befuddled. And the travel industry would grind to a halt!If we liked ,we could call those people politicians lol.

Some of the decisions regarding major public health issues and economic issues suffer from this same impediment. An excess of data!  Bet you never heard that one?! We are addicted and our leaders are even more addicted to data. And that has led them to many wrong decisions and at other times seriously delayed ones. Vice-president Cheney called out Obama on that one early on. He called him a “ditherer” in terms of Foreign Affairs and I am convinced there was a strong degree of Truth to that statement. We weren’t allowed to say it, however, or we would be called “racist”- but that is another matter.

Let us start with a definition of terms. ”Science” of course needs no such introduction- certainly not the definition from its founding father Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1626).Bacon was thinking of a simple process-Observation, Hypothesis, Experiment, Conclusion. He must be turning over in his grave to see what his methodology has become! Contemporary science has become, with respect to the original ideas of Bacon, what the Democratic party has become to the original Jeffersonian idea of Democracy!. A huge swamp of complexity, manipulation and corruption-people pursuing their personal academic ambitions, control-mad bureaucrats like Fauci and felonious pharma companies keeping a watchful eye on profit -making and a blind eye to public health. What a mess?!

Once again, modern “science” needs no definition. It is better known than Barrabas in the Passion. It has more name-recognition than Trump or Madonna lol. It is a veritable  God! Not to be challenged, not to be questioned. Certainly not to be criticized. Its scripture, at least in the medical field, is Pub Med-the listing of all officially published articles from the National Library of Medicine. And it’s Pope, the supreme authority on the interpretation of its scripture, is the Cochrane Data Base-the meta-analysis of as many scientific papers as possible- arranged according to the “quality of the study” whatever that may mean. One thing for sure is doesn’t mean is insight, accuracy and usefulness lol. But the dubiousness of this problematic Cochrane approach to truth is a subject for another time.

Then there is “scientism”. Webster’s defines it as “the principle that scientific methods can and should be applied in all fields of investigation”. H-m-m- “In all fields”? -like religion and love and spirituality? I don’t think so. I remember a discussion with a good friend of mine who later became a high-ranking academic Epidemiologist-head of a University department none the less!. Ugh! Aren’t they the ones who messed up the entire Covid intervention?! To be fair, there were a lot of other accomplices- like ambitious civil servant types like Fauci and pharma company representatives and dubious “gain-of function” researchers like Ralph Barik of North Carolina. But the Epidemiologists have given them all “scientific credibility”. After all, they trade in the holy grail of modernism-facts and statistics. What could possibly be more pure and righteous lol?

And what is Epidemiology? Webster’s says: “the branch of medicine that investigates all the elements that contribute to the occurrence or non-occurrence of a disease in a population”. Can you read the subtext?! It’s all about numbers and data and statistical correlations!

So my friend, so enamored with his new-found passion, said to me:” Can you tell me anything we cannot investigate with this approach?” Another inspiration from the heavens came! ”How about whether the music of Mozart is beautiful or not” That was a very short discussion, indeed, lol.

One of my first real encounters with “scientism” and its inevitable catechisms, occurred during the preparation of my first book: ”Snakes and Ladders: Aphorisms for Modern Living”. One of the more provocative Aphorisms in the book stated:”There is no Evidence for Evidence-Based Medicine”. I had researched this hypothesis in the medical scriptures of Pub Med(Remember that holy site lol?).And I could find no studies that tested out this theory. Surprising given how predominant the theory was in the medical world that loves studies so much. But since this was to be a published book, I wanted to be sure I hadn’t missed something. So I called around to people I knew in the academic world and was told I was in luck. McGill had a visiting professor who was a world-renowned expert in the field! So I called him up. No reply. Then I found his email. After the second request I finally got a reply (busy man I guess !) It sounded something like this: ”How could you possibly question “evidence-based medicine”?! That is outrageous (he actually meant heretical but that word was not in his  lexicon lol).This is the basis of our entire medical practice. It is inexcusable to challenge it”. I had obviously touched a sensitive chord. It was like telling a devout Catholic that Jesus was not crucified really-as most Muslims believe btw. I had challenged his theological orthodoxy. How foolish of me to think I would get a “scientific” objective response.

He then went on and asked: “In any case, how could we possibly research this?” I responded: ”Well, I am not a researcher by trade but it seems like a relatively simple procedure-certainly compared to many of the complex research paradigms I have seen. In my field, psychiatry, for example, you take a group of patients diagnosed by DSM-4 criteria with Major Depression Divide the group in two and give one group of psychiatrists the directive to reference each of their decisions from the medical literature. And tell the control group to proceed as normal, use their knowledge and their experience and their clinical judgment to make decisions. Then compare the outcomes.” Easy-peasy. But they will never do that!! It challenges their theology. On top of that, there is a fair possibility that the control group would actually do better! What would that do to their theoretical edifice?! It would collapse-just like the Marxists I knew after they heard about the horrors of Stalinism. So they will take no chances. Beliefs are too important to be challenged by Reality!

In this article, we introduce, as well, a new term-“studyism’ .Since you will not find this  anywhere  else, despite its deep metaphysical significance, I will define it for you. It is: “the belief that in order to get to the root, the Reality of anything serious, you need a study.” You will hear that not only from medical researchers but also from politicians and economists and businessmen and even social scientists. Perhaps only mystics and true artists are exempt. And of course lovers lol. They need no study to tell them they are on the right track-even if they aren’t!

So we have Commissions of Inquiry, Royal Commissions, feasibility studies , climate change studies, etc. etc. Whenever a politician doesn’t know what to do he orders a study. For example, right now in the U.S.A. the head Republican in the House of Representatives, Kevin McCarthy, has ordered an impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden. The evidence of Biden’s corruption is long-standing and overwhelming but first a study is needed. Of course.

Another episode from my relatively brief career in Academic psychiatry. I was heading a Community Clinic in a suburb of Montreal, attached to the Douglas Hospital-one of the teaching hospitals in the McGill University network. A new hot-shot, ambitious psychiatry researcher was being interviewed for a high position in the hospital executive. He spent a day and a half talking to various hospital personnel. On the second day, he made a report to the doctors. I saw that in that short period of time he had been able to identify most of the major problems in our institution and the outlines for future possible action.

But the hospital executive was not satisfied. They needed to have a more empirical, ”robust” ,M.B.A. style report .So they hired a consulting firm at considerable expense (? Approx. $100,000-maybe more). When the final report came out, I read it carefully. It was full of statistics and maps and figures. But I could not recognize my institution in the report ! Dr. Leichner’s brief report seemed to me much more relevant. But, in the end, both reports were tabled and the hospital went on-business as usual. I believe that is the most common outcome of studies. Funding for a large industry of consultation and generally ignoring the findings in the interests of the Realpolitik of the institution. Any wonder that we are in such a state lol?!

In Canada I entered the medical field just as National Health Care (we called it Medicare at the time) was being instituted. Each year our system has gotten worse-at least in terms of accessibility. When I entered the field you could be seen in the E.R. most often within the hour. Now you can easily wait 18 hours before you see a doctor. The last time I went to an E.R. (the place where I had studied!) I stayed 2 hours and had not even been screened let alone seen a doctor. I simply left and took an appointment with a cardiologist- an old friend- the next day. All was well fortunately. If it had been a heart attack (as it could have been by the symptoms) I may well have died in the waiting room!

As our system was deteriorating, there were more and more studies- Commissions of Inquiry- provincial and federal. There was even a Royal Commission (la crème de la crème). None of these studies changed anything significant. And now, unsurprisingly, we are having a revolt of the nursing staff- who find their working conditions untenable.

So bottom line, Studies don’t work! They are often, in fact, just designed to give politicians a clear conscience or worse still to cover up their incompetence. We don’t need more studies! We need leaders of vision and sincerity and courage. But they are hard to find. And even if we find them I believe our ‘democratic” system filters them out- in favour of people-pleasers and fast-talking salesman types.

Now, we can ask the question as to why studies don’t work. Here are a few explanations. I am referring mostly to medical studies but this schema can easily be applied to other areas like politics and the Economy.

1)The initial bias of the authors-whether ideological or financial. When I was teaching at McGill in the Faculty of Medicine, they asked me to do a course on Research in Psychiatry-which I gladly agreed to. As I was looking into the material (this was in the 1980’s) I came across a very interesting article (sorry I have not been able to relocate this article so you’ll have to trust me on this one. Not very scientific, I know lol).This brilliant author went over the most influential articles published in the preceding 10 years. But before reading any of the conclusions he back-checked the leading author’s previous publications and their academic trajectories to see what might be their biases. He came to an astounding conclusion (astounding only if you are naïve in this area of activity).Not one ,that’s right not one, of the studies came to a conclusion that was opposite to the lead authors antecedent bias! So much for objectivity in science!

2) The hidden and less than hidden agendas of the institutions financing these studies including the Public Health Institutions and the Universities that are all “captured” by their monetary dependence on government and pharmaceutical industry sponsorship.

3)The constant bugaboos in Statistical Analysis-Selection Bias and Confounding Variables-things that every student of science learns about in their Statistics 101 class. These items are still distorting factors in the most advanced statistical analysis published in the most prestigious medical journals.. The examples are legion. In my clinical experience it was most obvious in the campaign against benzodiazepines and the lack of serious equivalent studies of the alternatives-most often SSRI anti-depressants. So benzodiazepines always came out looking bad-even if in medical practice they were often enough a good alternative. If you read the literature they cause all kinds of horrible things like Alzheimer’s and terrible withdrawal .Except every study I could find contains a selection bias where the benzo group already had more serious illness to start with and some of the illness may actually have been the beginning of Dementia itself! The research did not fit my clinical experience either. That is always a tell-tale sign! But most of the profession goes along with the propaganda. After all, it’s “science” lol

4) The Law of Diminshing Returns on Data Collection(previously mentioned).More is not necessarily better!

5) The ”study” groups do not correspond well to the clinical application groups. We had this problem in psychiatry where some of the larger institutions had their set groups of Schizophrenics or Bipolar patients on which they tried every new medication. These were professional research patients! Plus, each study has exclusionary criteria-like you can’t have a co-morbidity or a substance problem. Except the Clinical Population we are treating has all of that. So the knowledge gained in one group is not necessarily applicable to the other.,

Most recently we saw this with the Covid vaccines. People with comorbidities were excluded as were pregnant women. But then the vaccine was rolled out and often mandated for those very groups that were excluded. How could the studies inform us of the risks in that context. They couldn’t and didn’t.

6) Sophisticated randomized , double-blind studies are very expensive to do. So are Commissions of Inquiry and Royal Commissions btw. There will never be enough resources in the entire universe to allow us to study all of the possible medical interventions in a normal doctor’s  (is “normal doctor”  an oxymoron lol?) daily practice.

7) The studies we are talking about are inevitably statistical . They generate probabilities rather than certainties . But clinical reality is about specific people at a specific time. The statistics may or may not apply! For example, if SSRIs are effective in 70% of cases of Major Depression (some would dispute that finding but that is not germane to our present discussion) then how do I know that my patient will be in that 70%. And what if his timeline of response is different from the others ?What if he chooses to stop the meds because of its side effects? What if he has ideological biases against taking meds, something we see more and more these days. None of the research will help us with these clinical realities!

Addendum to Studies

8) And perhaps most troubling of all, facts are not facts and data is not data. As Kellyanne Conway famously stated, there are alternative facts, for which she was loudly denounced. But actually she had a point!

“Facts” have to be understood in context. In order to fully assimilate their significance ,we have to understand who stated them, in what context, for what reason. We also have to understand what facts were not being stated, which facts were exaggereated and which were minimized. So data is not data! When politicians and jusrists say they are only “following the facts” they are most often lying. So data is not simply data. And that poses a deep metaphysical problem for the Empiricists!

Let me give you three examples to clarify what I mean:

2-During the Covid pandemic(and yes, O conspiracy theorists lol ,there was a pandemic! That was not a lie!) they began to report on “Covid Deaths”. We later learnt that this meant deaths with Covid, not necessarily deaths from Covid. We can add into the mix here that the PCR tests being used to confirm Covid were not particularly reliable and tended to highly exaggerate the Covid component. Now deaths themselves should be more or less reliable and undeniable but even those figures could be altered by people who had an axe to grind in scaring people into taking the vaccines. So the entire data point “Covid deaths” falls apart on closer inspection

2- The Republican investigation of the Bidens finds bank records of shell companies and Biden family members receiving money from corrupt foreign governments. There are videos of Joe (the big guy) being in on conversations about Hunter’s foreign business dealings and pictures of Joe meeting some of these partners in person. There are also business partners and foreign agents testifying about these “Pay for Play” (i.e. bribery schemes. So what do the Democrats say?! “There is no evidence!’; What?! So if the data doesn’t suit your purposes you deny it’s existence. Once again facts are not facts.

3-This one is more uncomfortable for me to report but if we are going to be people of Truth rather than people of echo chambers, it needs to be said. I have the deepest respect and admiration for Dr. James Thorp the OBGYN who began speaking out against the vaccine use in pregnancy. I agree with almost everything he says and believe he is sending a very important message about the dangers of the vaccine in pregnancy. However, there was something that didn’t sit well with me about his discourse. I believe part of the problem is that he too has drunk the Empiricist kool-aid. Let me explain.

Dr. Thorp has many statistics which indicate that the rate of damage to the fetus ,miscarriages and stillbirths are much higher in vaccinated pregnant women. The figures he usually sites are around 50 times higher! But if we look closer at his published article (I am referring here to the pre-print) we get another message! Now I understand that he was working with Vaers data which is hugely under-reported and problematic so he can be excused for his lack of accuracy. Trying to rely on Vaers data for a solid conclusion is like RFKjr. relying on the Democratic Party to be elected president lol.

Now the Vaers register was set up to pick up
“signals” as they call it in the trade. And signals there are! But hard data?!Let us examine the figures Dr. Thorp reports in his article:”Covid-19 vaccines: The impact on Pregnancy Outcomes and Menstrual Function.”

There are many variables to choose from but they all point to the same conclusion. Let us choose “fetal malformations” as we recently had an unfortunate case of this pathology in our Sufi family. Now if we compare the Covid vaccine to the flu vaccine, it causes 11 times the amount of fetal malformations. But the denominator is extremely low! The covid vaccine caused 3.3 cases from a billion shots?! That is one case in 300 million doses?! When you put into the mix the W.H.O. statistic that 3% of children (other palaces say 6%!) are born with fetal malformations, the clinical relevance4 of these Vaers facts simply unravels. So it is not surprising that the clinicians on the ground are not seeing this! It is too rare! Once again, the good guys have it wrong!

What does all of this mean? It means that the Empiricists are often misleading us! In fact, the subjective trumps the objective in reliability! Put that in your pipe and smoke it (don’t mix in too much pot with it lol) O people of the outer. What we really need are people on the front lines (doctors and nurses) who are keen observers. And we need professionals who are able to hear the patients (Seeing and hearing once again) Unfortunately even if these professionals began with these capacities their “intellectual” objective training has probably beat it out of them The fact that almost no pediatrician,s beside Dr. Paul Thomas, were seeing the link between vaccines and autism- over decades of use! is just more proof of the dulling of their senses! So we are in a serious conundrum at this point in medicine.

Bottom Line: Studies are only modestly useful- at best. They need to be complemented by front-line clinical experience , by anecdotes(yes, anecdotes-my favourite source of Reality! Much to be learnt there),by common sense, reflection and even inspiration.( See  “Epistemology” in other articles on my blogsite(sufipilgrimsprogress.com).

I’m sure by now you are all wondering: ”So who is’our side’? Who are the good guys? And why did they get it wrong on the masking issue?!” So here goes.

The good guys are docs like Peter McCullough, Paul Marik, Pierre Kory, Meryl Nass, Robert Malone and lawyers like RFKjr. And Mary Holland and many others. They are people of integrity  ,insight and creativity. I respect and love them all! They have put everything on the line to denounce the corruption around us and to affirm the “scientific” Truth. But, they too, have “drunk the koolaid” lol Their koolaid is made of organic ingredients-no pesticides, no artificial flavours or colourings lol. Only natural sugar like honey. But it is koolaid nevertheless.

So what do I mean by kool-aid? It is the belief that science is the best and often the only way to truth. That we need these large-scale studies ultimately to discover the truth. That the current so-called “scientific method” is like motherhood and apple pie. No-one can be against it! They believe that the only problem here is that there are corrupting influences that are contaminating and capturing the pure and holy science. If we could only go back to  objective science we would be back in the garden of Eden before the fall .Bottom Line: They have bought the Epistemology of Empiricism! Everything can be known from data-from the measurable, outer realities. And that is a serious metaphysical error.

Let me elaborate further on the Epistemology question. It first came up in the courts where I was representing people claiming their salary insurance from their employers and insurance companies.. Most of them were suffering either from C.F.S. ( Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) or Depression of various sorts. I noticed, after a few times, a curious phenomenon. The judges had understood better than the doctors what was really going on. How could that be? ! It was counter-intuitive.

And then it came to me. The judges were more open-minded. They considered various forms of input-from patients witnessing, from their relatives, from anecdotes (love those anecdotes lol). They also used their common sense. The doctors were operating from their medical science conditioning. And they weren’t getting it.

As I began to reflect more and more, I realized that there were many avenues to the truth-even the truth of medicine. ”More than one way to skin a cat” no? But the three principal inputs that can solve most problems or, at least see them for what they are, are “seeing” (with the inner eye) hearing” (with the Ear of Truth ) and feeling(intuition).That at least partly explained why the judges were more lucid. They were really listening. The docs were having their hearing occluded by their conceptual training. Seeing in docs? We won’t even go there for now lol! None of these modalities of perception are popular with the Empiricists! In fact, it is anathema to them.

Ok. Let’s go back to the mask issue as promised in the title. So the “good guys-our side “ scour Pub Med (remember-the holy  scripture lol) and find no evidence that masks work in any credible scientific studies. So masks don’t work. Oops! Wrong! Aristotle has creeped in once again with his syllogistic logic. Good olde Aristotle. Can’t escape him anywhere-including in religion! Now if we step out of the idolatry of scientific studies for a moment, we will find a whole nother world And as Jessy Waters likes to say on Fox “And this is my world”! The world of subtlety and inwardness and mystery and contradictions. So much more free and user-friendly!
In that light, here is my evidence for masks In all fairness, I got a head start-well before Covid! Here it is!

1-I was on an airplane probably going to some medical conference in Boston. Yes, I too was a believer! Next to me was a businessman -perhaps an MBA-type (subject of another article at some point lol). He was wearing a mask .I asked him why and he said that everytime he got on  an airplane( and he was travelling all around the country regularly), he was sick for a few days with some viral illness. Since he started wearing a mask on the suggestion of a fellow businessman , he had never been sick. A story to make Sir Francis Bacon proud for once! Observation-Hypothesis-Experiment-Conclusion. Beautiful in its simplicity! But no self-respecting modern scientist would accept such evidence. They would denounce it as anecdotal, a random occurrence, good luck or the best of all explanations “psychosomatic”-all in his head! Placebo effect, no doubt.

2- I got the Covid infection four times in each of its variants! Each time I got it I had forgotten or decided not to use the mask. Three of these times were from talking at close range with “asymptomatic carriers” another entity that the “good guys” would like to deny. The fourth time I got it from my grandchildren. The “good guys” don’t like the idea of spread from children either. I guess it is too close to lockdowns and child masking for them to swallow . But indeed there IS spread from children even if they, themselves don’t get very sick!That’s why the teachers wanted lockdowns. Saying that was simply from laziness is not fair akin to defamation.

3- Asians in Japan and China have been wearing masks for decades.. Have their nations simply gone mad-like we did during the pandemic!?

4-Alan Dershowitz is being interviewed on Fox three years into the pandemic. He shows his simple but tightly fitting mask and says. ”I have several medical co-morbities but I never got sick once from Covid.

5) During the heyday of the Delta variant almost all the Democrat politicians were wearing masks and distancing but the Republicans were cavorting around the front lawn of the White House. Very few Democrats seemed to be falling sick. But the Republicans including Trump, his assistants and his wife were falling like flies.

6- During the flu seasons of 2020/2021 and 2021/2022 there were almost no flu cases! People were masking and distancing. Now the scientific types will say either that the flu was diagnosed as Covid (I had no trouble seeing the difference) or that somehow the Covid virus dominated the flu one. That is possible. But I believe the masking and distancing were protective against the flu .In 2022/2023 we had an almost normal flu season. And yet ,the Covid virus was still very much present. So it wasn’t the competing virus that eliminated the flu. I believe it was the masking.

7- The doctors in the hospitals seemed to believe in the usefulness of their protective masks. They were clamoring for their N95 masks! Then again doctors are a gullible lot by definition- so perhaps their testimony should not be considered.

 

All of this evidence would be called “anecdotal” by the” pur et dur” scientists. And yet, just as the evidence of Biden-family corruption coming out in drips and drabs and now spurts is getting more and more credible, perhaps the positive effect of masking should be reconsidered.

So much more to say! A la prochaine, Sufi Ibrahim

P.S. The good guys are still good lol. They are just not complete!

 

 

 

 

 

Nationalism Re-Examined

Nationalism Re-Examined

Nationalism is a very sensitive subject. As soon as you start generalizing about national traits you are accused of “racial profiling” and racism. -especially if you talk about negative traits. Yet nations are really quite distinct- just as genders are quite distinct- despite current narratives.

People generally have a lot of emotional investment in their nation. Some are unduly proud like the Americans who keep repeating in their discourse on public media that they are “the greatest nation ever on Earth”. There are a few discounting facts to that narrative- like the fact that they rank the lowest on almost every social variable amongst the developed nations. But who cares about facts when you have pride lol.

There is also an even more sensitive area which has to do with shame about our national characteristics. So, for example, Jews will regularly give their children gentile -sounding names like Tiffany and Elizabeth for example lol. Some will shorten their last name so it sounds less Jewish. So Bergman becomes Berry and Glouberman becomes Glidden. Muslims, as well, will shorten their name from Mohammed (a truly honorable name) to Moe so they sound like the owner of a delicatessen. Black people, most obviously athletes, will shave their heads as if there is something wrong with God-given curly hair. I don’t get it! Two of my childhood heroes were Angela Davis and Jimmy Hendriks. I really admired their natural Afro hairdos!

Then there was one of my clients-an indigenous man from the north of Quebec- who pretended to be a Québecois pure laine and hid his identity for years in therapy. It ended up catching up with him in his relationships- because his Québecois partners didn’t appreciate his taciturnness-an indigenous characterstic (OOPs! Is that “racial profiling?) It might have been easier for him if he had stated in advance that he doesn’t talk too much lol

In my first book: “Snakes and Ladders:Aphorisms for Modern Living” I make the following statement:” We are each caricatures of our national origins” ! That may sound extreme especially for those with a serious dose of Western education lol. We were taught over and over again the nature/nurture hypothesis. And even there the emphasis was on the individual and the family genetics as opposed to the collective national ones. Yet, over and over again, travelling all around the world and interacting with many different societies, I could see the national characteristics so clearly!

I remember my first trip to Europe with a fellow medical student named Alan. We first came to London. It was cold and rainy. Everything was really expensive. We could not find a hotel within our budget and we ended up sleeping on the floor of a YMCA with a large group of German tourists. It was less than twenty years from WWII and the idea of sleeping in a room of Germans was still an intimidating prospect-especially being raised in a secular Jewish family.

So we decided to move to France. There was an immediate change in the environment. The hotels were a lot cheaper (this was before the European Common Market!) It was sunny and the charcuteries allowed us to eat easily within our budget . We sat out in the beautiful groomed parks and felt like we were almost in paradise ( France has since gone downhill considerably and when I visit it now it feels more like pre-Civil War Syria -but that is a whole other subject! )

When we got tired of the hedonism of Paris, we moved on to Germany. As we got to the border, I immediately noticed the militaristic aspect of the Germans ( btw we had a great time as well in that country).But that militarism of the customs agents triggered something in me. I then looked at my friend Alan and said: ’You know Alan we have been sold a crock. A bunch of B.S. Our educational system, liberal as it was at the time, taught us that all peoples are essentially alike. Only individuals are different.That is clearly not what we are seeing”  And on top of that, these were three ”advanced” Western peoples. Imagine the differences if we compare them to Asian and African nations?!That may have been one of my earliest Aha experiences. The liberal viewpoint was misleading at best-at worst more ideological denial from the bleeding-heart liberals lol

On a personal note, I have always been adamantly opposed to nationalism-seeing it simply as a collective form of egotism and selfishness. Which it is! But there is another side to all of this. Just as we must come to terms with our individual ego (nafs in Arabic) we need to come to terms with our national origins-in all its dimensions. Each nation has its strengths and its weaknesses. Yet most people can only see the good qualities of their national origins and have difficulty imagining its shadowy aspects.

A case in point. In the early 2000’s I was studying Arabic in Amman and living with a few other students in a shared apartment. One of the students I got close to was of Palestinian descent-with all of the baggage that entails! One day I was discoursing  on religion and made the statement that each religion had its particular strengths and weakness. Now, just from a theological point of view, this is difficult for any religious nationalist (and yes, there is nationalism based on religious practice as well!) to hear. The vast majority of people are convinced that their religion is best and there is a large percentage of those who believe that their religion is the only means of salvation-even if their scriptures, properly interpreted, say the opposite!

So when I got to the issue of the good qualities of each religion, I was somewhat surprised , which I shouldn’t have been because actually it was quite predictable, to hear my Palestian friend ask: ”So where does Judaism excel, in that vein”. His bias was clearly obvious. But after getting over the initial shock, I responded from an inspiration that I get from time to me in these situation. ” In its humanism”

Now, I can see that if you identify Judaism with how the Israeli government behaves, you could hardly be blamed for concluding otherwise. But if you look at Jewish history, if you study the Arts and Sciences and philosophy produced by Jewish people, you can see what I was getting at. I have a particular fondness these days for remembering vocabulary in the Yiddish language from my youth-vocabulary that highlights the inevitable foibles of humanity both on an individual and collective level. Actually identifying these foibles helps us accept them! Much more so than those coming from a mindset of nobility and dignity! (I’ll let you guess who those may be lol)

So when I see what is going on in American politics,”kurveshe”(whoorishness) is the most precise term I can find to describe it. When I listen to overly abstract woke intellectuals I think: ”mishegene”(literally crazy) and when I hear my clients stories of intrusive mother-in-laws the word “schvigger” comes to mind – a word that literally means mother-in-law but in Yiddish becomes almost a swear word! Much more on this at a later time. But for now, I feel proud to dredge out some of this ancient vocabulary from my past that helps me identify and deal with what is going on nowadays.

The troubling aspects of nationalism and racism goes back a long way. I still remember an episode where I was asked to give the sermon at the youth sabbath at our local synagogue. I don’t even think I was 13 at the time. Being my usual controversial self, I took on the subject of Jews’ bias towards others. There were two dépanneurs(  handy stores) near us. One was Jewish owned. The other was owned by a Greek man. But all the Jews bought from the Jewish store. So I brought this out and told them” You complain about antisemitism but you are acting in the same manner towards this Greek shopkeeper”. Somehow the message got through. The next time I met the Greek man, he thanked me profusely. His business picked up in the weeks following my talk! Sometimes, people DO listen lol!

Ok So let’s get back to the central point here. How do we deal properly with nationalism. There are many improper ways, as we have seen throughout history but managing this domain ethically and responsibly is a whole other matter! In one of the visitations of the Virgin Mary (I believe it may be the one at Medugorge) she said to the young girls who saw her: “Mankind is on the wrong track. If they don’t change their ways of materialism and nationalism, there will be more and more natural disasters”. So when I see the floods and fires and heatwaves of climate change I don’t think “carbon imprint”. Rather I think “man’s misbehaviour around deeper issues than carbon use”!

The initial trigger for writing this article was an interview on Epoch TVof an author named Rick Richman (forgot to change his last name to Rich lol). He wrote a recent book called: ”And None Should Make Them Afraid” about eight people who contributed to the Zionist project, Clearly not a popular topic in my current Muslim community lol And the first person he talked about was Theodore Herzl. Not usually my cup of tea! If I wanted to talk about great Jewish personalities I would start with the Ball Shem Tov, Reb Nahman of Bratislava and Maimonides. Perhaps Martin Buber. But this was about a person I really didn’t have much sympathy for. And I am sure there are people around, especially in the Arab world, who dislike him much more than I do,

Nevertheless, Richman painted a relatively positive picture of a man committed to an ideal that he spent his life on. But most interesting, only towards the end of his life, did he reveal that at 12 years old, he had a dream/vision of Moses bringing him up into the presence of God! Now in the Islamic tradition, we are taught that if a Prophet appears in a dream it is really him. The devil cannot take the form of a Prophet. So…the founder of Zionism was Divinely instructed to work towards a state of Israel.Ajib!

Now for many pious Christians, this a a no-brainer. They believe that the Jews had to return to the Holy Land in order to set the stage for the return of Jesus! And after all Jesus and all of his Apostles were all Jews, something it has taken Christians a long time to swallow! But for Muslims this is anathema.

And yet, the deeper thinkers amongst Muslims, realize that nothing happens in this world without Divine permission. I have even heard Jordanians thinking that Israel was a punishment for Muslims not holding tightly enough to their own religion. However, this story line is more positive I would say. The Jews returning to Israel is part of the unfoldment of Divine destiny. As said the great Sheikh Hashimi of Damascus “fi kooli shay khayran”(in everything is goodness).Even in Zionism lol!

As to Muslims- concerning the question of nationalism- Allah has told us in the Quran 49;13 “O mankind. We created you from a male and a female. and made you into peoples (shououb) and tribes so that you may get to know each other. “There are a lot of meanings in this short ayat but for our current purposes, it is enough to point out that nations are not an invention of man as some sociologists and anthropologists might like to postulate. They are natural creations of our Lord. Besides this Quranic quote, we have the well-known hadith of our Prophet saws which says” The love of the homeland comes from Faith” Another support for the positive aspects of nationalism. So it is incumbent upon us to accept that reality.

Thus we realize that we have to come to terms with our own nationhood and that of others-no mean feat actually. Because this is deep in our coding, yes even in our genetic coding. And much of it is unconscious.

I will proceed to highlight one case where these differences have created an enormous amount of conflict. Then we will go on to some final general conclusions.

Let’s start with the Middle East- a problem that has defeated many politicians and diplomats. I have no pretensions about solving this problem! But I, may be able to shed some light on the psychological aspects involved. Jews and Arabs. Why are they unable to come to terms and make a peace treaty. This is a very difficult and complex problem. But let us start at the base-their different psychological makeups. The defining fault of the Jewish nation is “doubt”. Some of the rabbis I met in Jerusalem were well aware of this! One of them said to me;” If you are committed to doubt, and most doubters are lol, Ashem (God) will supply you with all the data you need to keep doubting. So the Jews who doubted Moses in the dessert, the Apostles who doubted Jesus, the Jews in the Quran who couldn’t decide what kind of cow to sacrifice, were all true to form-they were Jewish doubters. When the Muslims run into these stories they react saying: ”You see. They are really unbelievers”. They don’t factor in the Jewish mind-set.

The Arabs, on the other hand, have no such problem. They are sure they are right-always lol. The equivalent to Jewish doubt is Arab pride! And both are problematic.  ”My way or the highway” think the Arabs. .There is no room for second opinions. They are invalid by definition. So how do people with such different approaches get together to negotiate. They have clearly not been able to do so, so far!

Early on, during my stay in Jerusalem, and just before accepting Islam, I was introduced to the holy book of Islam-the Quran. I immediately recognized its authenticity! And yes, in English translation lol I then looked around me at the behaviour of the people in East Jerusalem and the West Bank and thought: “Why would God send this authentic Revelation to these people?! “My Sufi teacher-who was a highly knowledgeable Hafiz Quran and Qadi (judge in the Islamic court) at the time had warned me about this. He told us not to go to the famous al Aqsa mosque for 6 months after conversion. He was afraid we would lose our faith!

So, sitting on the side of the road going up to the Mount of Olives, I asked Allah again why these people (the Arabs) had received this book. And the answer came back loud and clear: ”They are the ones who will hold it most tightly”! And so it has been throughout history! So Allah himself is NOT a black and white thinker!  He could and can see that these people, as faulty as was and is their behaviour, also had a particular quality of perseverance and tenacity ( the deniers would say “stubbornness” lol) that was uniquely suited to this purpose!

On the other hand the Jews who had been the previous recipient were not as perseverant in holding to their way. But their doubt and reflection has led them to be great scientists, musicians and artists.” To each his own” as they say. And ALL of it is from our Lord!

So what do we do with this conundrum? The answer is the same as in many other situations- “Develop Awareness”. We, all, need to be aware of how much we conform to our national characteristics. Then we have to learn to affirm and express our strengths and fight against our weaknesses-on an individual and a collective level. This is the jihad-a-nafs of Sufism (the struggle with the ego) but, in this case, we are struggling with the collective ego. No mean feat given that all the like-minded people around us (our nation) are telling us we are fine just the way we are. But we aren’t!

Once we accept our tribal limitations and work against the weaknesses, it is then incumbent upon us to accept these limitations and strengths of other nations and treat them with dignity and respect- rather than “othering them” to use a current Americanism.

May God help us in this sacred enterprise because it is a holy work! Salaams, Sufi Ibrahim

 

The Good, The Bad and the Conundrum of Activism

The Good, the Bad and

The Conundrum of Activism

The Trigger: This article was triggered by an interview of Francis A. Boyle, Human Rights Activist and Professor of International Law on CHD TV. What we learn in this interview is that the U.N. banned the use of biological weapons in an International Convention adopted in 1971.The United States signed on in 1972 with both bodies of Congress voting for it. In 1989 the U.S. added to the International Law its own prohibition with the U.S. Code 175-an addition to the Terrorism Act! Code 175 says “whoever knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains or possesses any biological agent toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon shall be fined or imprisoned for life or any term of years

So, it is a criminal offense to be developing these weapons with a maximum sentence of life imprisonment (the lawyers and politicians who drew up the act didn’t like capital punishment lol) And yet since at least the 80’s under Ronald Reagan American scientists have been doing exactly that and keeping it undercover! We can understand their justifications: ”The Russians and the Chinese are doing it so we musn’t get behind”. Excuses, excuses! This is VERY dangerous stuff. And at this point ,I am convinced that Covid-19 Sars 2 is a product of that research! And it could get worse!

The thought immediately came to mind:  ”How could people be so evil, so reckless, so self-serving? I guess I am still naïve! This kind of evil has been going on for a long, long time. The Romans crucifying people and throwing them to the lions. The medieval tortures like the Iron Maiden. The Jews led into the gas chambers. The list goes on and on!

I still remember Sheikh Nazim in Peckham , London during one Ramadan in the 80’s saying “We are now under the hegemony of shaytan” and thinking “I think he’s going too far”! And hegemony was a word that should have been outside of his TurkEnglish vocabulaty lol. But, no, he was absolutely right. And those wooly-minded thinkers like Steven Pinker (“The Better Angels of our Nature”) and their data-analysis approach are sorely out of touch. No news there lol!

So…can it really be that bad?! And the simple answer is “Yes!”. Besides the usual human rights abuses like those of the Uighurs in China, the Chinese harvesting organs from Falum Dung members(that’s a new one but not dissimilar to the Nazis doing “scientific” experiments on Jews and not so long ago the Japanese torturing Chinese and Korean opposition forces, we now have a new slew of evil habits.

Let us name a few. So we have researchers in the U.S. and then in China doing “gain of function” research and calling it vaccine research which it clearly wasn’t. We have American pharma companies, exempt from all legal liabilities, having public health authorities mandating their ”safe and effective” vaccines (which were neither) to the entire population. We have large institutions- private and public- including universities (no surprise there .New and critical thinking left those premises a long time ago.)We have prestigious medical journals blocking the publication of useful research into repurposed medications for treatment and instead publishing misleading research some of which was so bad they had to retract the articles themselves. We have decades of vaccine mandates for children without any placebo-controlled studies and no long-term research on their overall effects on children. The list goes on and on! Man’s creativity in the field of mischief is truly astounding! No lack of new ideas there.

Once our inner vision begins to see all this, we may well feel overwhelmed and hopeless. How could this be and what can we do about it?” we may well ask. In Islam we were recommended to go to the hills with our sheep when the Last Days were approaching! Are we there yet?! We may well be but before we all become forest dwellers and hermits ( but btw the forests are no longer safe either nor the water in remote areas. In the forests we now have a plethora of ticks and Lyme disease and some of the most remote lakes are so contaminated with heavy metals that there are no fish left!) So there is no real refuge left!

There may however be a simpler answer. We need to seriously remember that, in any case, we are only here for a temporary period. As I like to remind myself and others from time to time, “the fatality rate of Earthly existence is 100%!” Sorry for the bad news, but none of us is going to survive anyway! So perhaps we should be thinking of the after-life and how best to be right with our Creator. Nothing else will do and nothing else can be so beneficial. All the religions teach that more or less! As say the A.A. people: ” Let go and let God”. He (the Light of the Heavens and the Earth) is the only trustworthy protector. All the others are destined to fail.

But what I really wanted to address in this article ,since good and evil have been contemplated from the beginning of time, is the question of activism. This question emerges out of the observation of endemic evil and what do we do about. Many times in history social activism and political theories have tried to address and redress the problem. Perhaps the most obvious in recent history was and still is Marxism. According to that philosophy, the problem is the exploitation of the working class and the solution is “The dictatorship of the proletariat”. We see where that got us when we look at Russia and China and North Korea to name but a few examples.

But nowadays we have newer and more limited actors in the field of activism-like “Doctors without Borders” trying to help people in war zones and “Amnesty International” trying to protect political prisoners, and Greenpeace and other environmental groups trying to protect the planet. One thing that surprized me in my practice as a psychiatrist was that the clients I saw who were in intimate relationships with these N.G.O. types were some of the people who were most disappointed by their relationships. It made no sense! Good people, no? Amnesty International, Médecins sans Frontières-how could these be bad people! As I contemplated this conundrum, I realized what was going on. These N.G.O. types were ideologues-people of principle! Often their hearts were dead. In fact they were so insensitive that it took really gross abuses in their environment to be able to fell anything! It sort of made sense!

Btw, I have my own personal history with activism! It started with student newspapers in high school and university, continued with protests against Canadian complicity in the Vietnam war and ended with Marxist medical services in a Community Clinic. It is a long story that I will only be able to tell it adequately when I eventually write my autobiography. Inshallah. But let me highlight a few episodes that eventually led to my disillusionment with this approach.

While I was at the community Clinic in East End Montreal I participated in a legitimate strike at a company called Carter White Lead. Many of the  workers there   were actually suffering from documented lead poisoning. We had a toxicologist on board who confirmed the diagnosis. In my mind I still held the slogan of “the dictatorship of the proletariat”lol. That was our salvation!.Boy can we be delusional at times! As an example it took Sartre, admittedly a brilliant man, more than a decade after being made aware of it  to denounce what was going on in Russia at the time of Stalin . In the meantime he had denounced Camus who was his informant in this matter as “intellectually not up to the task of analyzing the subtleties of the Russian Revolution ”(paraphrasing here).I still know very intelligent scholars who are unwilling to denounce Stalin. Their names will remain anonymous lol

 

When I saw this “proletariat” at Carter White Lead, my gut reaction was: ”These people in charge of our government?! No, thanks!” I had my first breakthrough!

Then I went to China with a group of community workers. That was 1973 and the Cultural Revolution was still going on but well-hidden from our view. We went to a school and when one of my companions, a College teacher at the time, realized that the principal of the school was earning much more than the workers and he confronted the workers about this inequality (which went against all Marxist principle) they said it was alright. He literally had a melt-down and a few hours later had to be rushed to the hospital with acute pneumonia! If you ever needed a clear example of a psycho-somatic reaction, this was a spectacular one. This fellow’s entire world had fallen apart Many people lost their faith in Marxism after that trip! Some melted into the “soft left” like the N.D. P. in Canada . Others, like myself, left activism and politics for good!

The third event that closed the chapter on Marxism for me was a large meeting of leftists, unionists and hard-core Marxist Leninists under the umbrella of a Marxist Group called “En Lutte” . At the head table were all the major leaders of the left wing. And when I saw them, it was obvious. ”No way, José” This group would be far worse than the current government under Robert Bourassa at the time. That was the last straw .Bye-bye Marx.

Another paradoxical thing I realized during these events, and I believe it is still true nowadays, is that the left-wing leaders treated their intimate partners much worse than their conservative homologues! Doesn’t make sense, right?! They are humanists and progressives and yet in their relationships they are egotistical, unfaithful and hedonistic.

You can see the same phenomena in American politics! Compare how the Bush’s and Reagan were with their wives to the string of philandering Kennedy’s all the way down to the present iteration. Yes there were exceptions like Carter and Obama on the Democrat side and Trump for the Republicans. But “the exception confirms the rule” as they say. If you are a woman, I would stay away from progressives lol

There is so much more I could say but the two major points I really wanted to raise in this article were the state of the world -where evil reigns forcing us to adapt to it and the particular conundrum posed by the latest iteration of a Kennedy, in the person of RFKjr,

The latter has presented a particular dilemma for Truth-seekers like myself. On the one hand, I agree with almost everything he says. It is all well-documented and referenced and he is very careful to get the facts right. I agree with almost everything he proposes to do in getting rid of the “captured” health agencies and government institutions. Perhaps the only thing I disagree with is trying to run for the Democratic party. I am convinced they will run him out of the primary as they did with Bernie Sanders in a previous election . But RFKjr. is a very strategic person and may well be using the Democratic platform to gain visibility and then planning to run for a third or fourth party once the Democrats succeed in running him out of town as they are almost sure to do.

None of this is problematic for me! But what is seriously problematic is his “ghoulish” presence! There is something deeply wrong with this man and it has nothing whatsoever to do with his voice. I have tried to come to some convincing conclusion about what that is but for now it evades me. Could it be what he calls “the lust demons” which have been haunting his family including his father and two of his uncles going all the way back to his grandfather?! Or could it be unresolved substance use which he has apparently conquered (Btw I saw a similar thing in the famous Green Bay Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers and then learnt that he uses Ayahuasca as a means of spiritual upliftment. Ok. Case closed there!)

But there may be another explanation-at least a partial one- which applies to many, many people-Activism!? You see the real problem of activism is that it focuses on the negative. Even though it is attempting to resolve the problems, it can easily become obsessed with them. I saw that in medicine and psychiatry as well. My first wife, a true California Spiritual seeker nlol, confronted me with that: ” That’s the problem with you psychiatrists” she said in a moment of fury. You are in love with neurosis” She had a point.

My own Dad, who was by no means an intellectual, had the same issue. Although he had some dyslexia, I believe, he was so interested in history and politics that he worked his way through the entire set of volumes by Will and Ariel Durant called “The History of Civilization”! His conclusion: “Man is worse than animals ”. That was his final statement about Reality! And despite the fact that his argument is well-taken, it ultimately led him in the wrong direction. My own direction is the opposite! I go, rather, by the statement of Sheikh Hashimi of Damascus. ”Fi kooli shay khairan”(in everything there is good)What a revelation?! God created us, He knows more than anyone else our foibles and our defects. He created us that way. And he will lead us to the right path, if we trust in Him and follow His guidance. If, on the other hand, we follow the god of our own minds we are doomed to failure and disappointment. I am still working on it. And I hope you will be inspired to do likewise. Salaams, Sufi Ibrahim

Greed as Religion!

Let me give you a concrete example- the Covid vaccine! First it started with Trump and Fauci both on an ego-trip. That vice is called “pride ” the top of the line of Christian vices lol! Then the pharmaceutical companies saw windfalls of profit to be made.Yes, that is greed.Then the doctors who were doing just fine financially before the Covid kicked in with their multiple levels of ignorance! Firstly they bought the long-held mantra “vaccines are safe and effective” Ya right! Then they drank the archaic kool-aid that “Reality can only be seen through large-scale randomized, placebo controlled studies published in prestigious, peer-reviewed studies”( I always found that a mouthful lol).Then they refused to see all the nasty side effects of the vaccines( clinical blindness!).All of what they did, and they are the proximate cause of the disaster, was from ignorance mostly( yes, a touch of greed but mostly ignorance!)

One more attemppt here to get the message through lol>America has made “greed” into a religioin.The basic catechism is that “It’s all about the money”! This religion which includes MBA degrees,monetary management,finacial planning etc., etc. is so widespread(can we call it ‘pandemic’ lol/) that even those who are denouncing greed in various places are caught up in the “greedism” religion.I see a parallel with Feminism where even those who say they are not Feminists in effect on a deeper layer really are?! So what is the answer as the pragmatists w-another modernisr
Enter

You sent

religion- will ask.Broaden your horizons. Look for other vices.And if you are really courageous look for the positive in all this! That would be truly revolutionary!

Theology?!

Theology is the entry of the philosophical mind-set (i.e “mind productions”) into the domain of religion. It’s cost /benefit ratio is probably nil i.e. the costs( over-riding the need for actual spiritual experience and mysticism in favour of mental gymnastics) is at least as onerous as its benefits- at least when well-done (providing clarity in one’s formulation of beliefs- on which to base one’s behaviour.) Much unnecessary confusion and conflict has been generated by this form of activity!For best effect, it needs to be detoxified by actual spiritual experience-of one sort or another. Salaams,Sufi Ibrahim

Study,Schmudy 2.0

I have come to the conclusion that we need to do a meta-study of studies?! No, not the Cochrane Meta-analysis type but rather a study about the usefulness of studies. Asking questions like: “Did this study change anything in the field?” “How much suffering and pain was reduced by the application of this study?”.Now this could be in medicine or any other field for that matter. I am guessing that the most common result would be ” nil”.But there is the outside possibility, due to the perverse incentives in studies(i.e. greed or professional ambition or pushing an ideological line) that studies would have a negative impact on outcomes. We hear talk about the military/industrial complex and the medical/pharma complex.But no-one is talking about the academic/study complex. It is a huge industry that may outweigh all the others. It certainly does already in reputation. Any volunteers to fund this study?! I doubt it lol
Like

Comment
Share

Understood and applied, any one of the posts on this site could change your life-forever!